The right to die with dignity in Ecuador: legal, ethical, and social analysis of constitutional ruling 67-23-IN/24
Keywords:
Death with dignity, personal autonomy, human rights, constitutional jurisprudence, bioethicsAbstract
The purpose of this research was to analyze the legal, ethical, and social impact of Constitutional Ruling 67-23-IN/24 in Ecuador, which established the conditional constitutionality of euthanasia in cases of serious and incurable illnesses. The study examined the relationship between the right to die with dignity, personal autonomy, and current criminal legislation, considering the arguments presented by the Constitutional Court in its decision. A qualitative approach was used, based on the analysis of legal documents, legal doctrine, and jurisprudence. Inductive and deductive methods were applied to interpret the scope of the constitutional decision and its alignment with human rights principles. Additionally, a comparative literature review on euthanasia regulations in different countries was conducted, identifying similarities and differences with the Ecuadorian case. The results indicated that the ruling represents progress in guaranteeing the right to self-determination and relief from suffering in extreme cases, while also establishing clear parameters for the partial decriminalization of euthanasia. However, the need for a regulatory framework to govern its application was evident, ensuring transparency and ethical-medical oversight. It was concluded that the Court’s decision reflects an evolution in the recognition of individual rights, although normative and social challenges remain in its implementation. The development of complementary legislation is recommended to ensure safe and regulated access to euthanasia in Ecuador.
Downloads
References
Altisent, R., Nabal, M., Muñoz, P., Ferrer, S., Delgado-Marroquín, M. T., & Alonso, A. (2021). Eutanasia: ¿es esta la ley que necesitamos? Atencion Primaria, 53(5), 102057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102057
Bertolín-Guillén, J. M. (2021). Eutanasia, suicidio asistido y psiquiatría. Revista de la Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría, 41(140), 51–67. https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/neuropsiq/v41n140/2340-2733-raen-41-140-0051.pdf
Cárdenas Jiménez, D. R., & Redrobán Barreto, W. E. (2023). La Eutanasia en el Ecuador, el derecho a una muerte digna. Código Científico Revista De Investigación, 4(E2), 584–610. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/ccri/v4/nE2/176
Carvajal, S., Portales, B., & Beca, J. P. (2021). Eutanasia: aclarando conceptos. Revista médica de Chile, 149(10), 1502-1506. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/rmc/v149n10/0717-6163-rmc-149-10-1502.pdf
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2024). Sentencia 67-23-IN/24. https://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/e2NhcnBldGE6J3RyYW1pdGUnLCB1dWlkOidlNzVjZThhMS1iMGM0LTQ0OWMtYmEyMy01MTdlYzVkYTY3NGQucGRmJ30=
Dubón-Peniche, M. d. C., & Bustamante-Leija, L. E. (2020). Entre la enfermedad y la muerte:«Eutanasia». Cirugía y cirujanos, 88(4), 519-525. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/cicr/v88n4/0009-7411-cir-88-4-519.pdf
Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial No. 180. Gobierno del Ecuador. https://biblioteca.defensoria.gob.ec/bitstream/37000/3427/1/C%c3%b3digo%20Org%c3%a1nico%20Integral%20Penal.pdf
Encalada Escobar, D. S., & Silva Barrera, E. P. (2024). Comparativo de la regulación de la eutanasia entre Ecuador y Canadá: Comparison of euthanasia regulation between Ecuador and Canada. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 5(4), 2802 – 2818. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i4.2456
Gruezo-Realpe, P., & Fernández-Rosales, N. (2024). Eutanasia En Ecuador: Reflexiones Médicas Y Jurídicas. Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurología, 33(1), 19-20. http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/pdf/rneuro/v33n1/2631-2581-rneuro-33-01-00019.pdf
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2015). Metodología de la Investigación. Mc Graw Hill.
Jiménez-Illapa, K., Cerpa-Tambaco, A., yGarcía-Segarra, H. (2024). La Eutanasia en el Derecho Procesal Ecuatoriano: Un análisis de la SENTENCIA 67-23-IN/24. Reincisol., 3(6), 4790-4812. https://www.reincisol.com/ojs/index.php/reincisol/article/view/443/1110
Martínez-León, M., Feijoo Velaz, J., Queipo Burón, D., & Martínez-León, C. (2022). Estudio médico legal de la Ley Orgánica de Regulación de la Eutanasia en España en comparación con el resto de los países que regulan la eutanasia y/o el suicidio asistido. Revista Española de Medicina Legal, 48(4), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reml.2022.01.003
Salame Ortiz, M. A., Cepeda Luna, C. D., & Bucaram Caicedo, A. K. (2025). Estudio crítico-jurídico de la sentencia 67-23-IN/24 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador: El derecho a una muerte digna. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, (3), 1–24. https://dilemascontemporaneoseducacionpoliticayvalores.com/index.php/dilemas/article/view/4702/4515
Vásquez Llerena, E. M., Luzuriaga Morán, K. A., Guevara López, D. A., & Herrera Villacis, S. K. (2023). La colisión de derechos en la decisión del uso de eutanasia en Ecuador: la ausencia de reconocimiento legal. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11i1.3810
Velasco Bernal, C., & Trejo-Gabriel-Galan, J. M. (2022). Leyes de eutanasia en España y en el mundo: aspectos médicos. Atención Primaria, 54(1), 102170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102170
Zurriaráin, R. G. (2020). Eutanasia “medicina” del deseo. Apuntes de bioética, 3(1), 47-63. https://revistas.usat.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/374
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oscar Gonzalo Jácome-Merino, Jorge Alexander Villacrés-Mejía, Jhoel Estefano Vargas-Adriano, Mesías Elías Machado-Maliza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista UGC agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
