Balancing criminal policy on firearms with public safety and the limits of the right to punish.

Authors

Keywords:

Firearm possession, criminal policy, ius puniendi, minimal intervention

Abstract

Within the Ecuadorian legal framework, the application of criminal law in firearm-related matters raises concerns about the proportionality of punishment and the necessity of state punitive intervention. The principle of minimal criminal intervention becomes crucial when addressing offenses that, although punishable, might be better resolved through less repressive means. Article 360 of the Organic Comprehensive Criminal Code, which addresses the possession and carrying of firearms, presents challenges regarding the extent of the ius puniendi when applied to conduct that does not involve violence or threat. This critical reflection questions whether the state is exercising its punitive power rationally and legitimately or violating the subsidiary nature of criminal law. The study advocates for a reevaluation of criminal policy grounded in a rights-based and minimal-intervention approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

César Elías Paucar-Paucar, Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes. Ecuador.

 

 

References

Bergalli, R. (1980). La recaída en el delito: modos de reaccionar contra ella. Sertesa.

Guerrero-Ramírez, L. F., & Morocho-Baculima, K. (2022). Análisis del principio de mínima intervención penal frente a la vulneración de la presunción de Inocencia en la legislación ecuatoriana. Polo del Conocimiento, 7(2), 955–973. https://www.polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/3628/html

Hernández, J. (2019) Nociones de Hermenéutica e Interpretación Jurídica en el contexto mexicano. 1era. Ed. UNAM.

Herrera, O. P., & Maldonado, L. M. (2023). Tenencia y porte regulado de armas en marco del Derecho Penal Ecuatoriano. Polo del Conocimiento, 8(8), 1679–1698. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/5932/html

Joza Castelo, E. (2025). Errores Tipológicos del Porte de Armas en los Procesos de Flagrancia. Polo del Conocimiento, 10(4), 1487-1508. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v10i4.9391

Medina-Peña, R., & Torres-Espinoza, J. J. (Coord.) (2024). El neoconstitucionalismo en la protección de los nuevos derechos. Sophia Editions.

Ojeda-López, N. A., & Medina-Medina, V. E. (2024). El principio de presunción de inocencia y la aplicación del procedimiento abreviado. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 7(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.62452/2q112t94

Pontón, D. (2014). Un debate ausente: la producción de inteligencia criminal en América Latina. Entrevista a Marcelo Fabián Saín. URVIO: Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, (15), 127-134. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7022314.pdf

Rodríguez Jiménez, A., & Pérez Jacinto, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, 82, 175–195. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Sánchez Flores, F. A. (2019). Fundamentos Epistémicos de la Investigación Cualitativa y Cuantitativa: Consensos y Disensos. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 13(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2019.644

Zurita Ruales, G. R. (2024). La tenencia y porte de armas traumáticas frente al derecho. Revista Imaginario Social, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.59155/is.v7i1.148

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

García-Sánchez, G. D. R., Correa-Manzano, D. E., & Paucar-Paucar, C. E. (2025). Balancing criminal policy on firearms with public safety and the limits of the right to punish. Revista UGC, 4(1), 78–83. Retrieved from https://universidadugc.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/rugc/article/view/281

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Innovación, inclusión y desarrollo social: Estudios aplicados en educación, derecho y gestión (Enero-marzo)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Geoconda Del Rocío García-Sánchez, Diana Elizabeth Correa-Manzano, César Elías Paucar-Paucar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Revista UGC agree to the following terms:

1. Copyright

Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.

© The authors.

2. License

The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en

This license allows:

  • Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
  • NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.

There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.