Tensile bond strength of dual-cure and self-adhesive resin cements to fiber posts: an in vitro study

Authors

Keywords:

Fiber post, dual-cure resin cement, self-adhesive cement, tensile bond strength, intraradicular adhesion

Abstract

This study analyzed the tensile bond strength of two resin cementation systems, evaluating whether the technical simplification of self-adhesive cements compromises the bonding force in glass fiber posts. Thirty single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into two groups ($n=15$), which underwent endodontic treatment and post-space preparation after being transversally sectioned. The posts were cemented using a conventional dual-cure adhesive resin system (RelyX™ ARC) and a dual-cure self-adhesive system (RelyX™ Unicem 2 Clicker™), strictly following the manufacturer's protocols. Through universal testing machine assays, it was determined that the conventional adhesive technique cement achieved a higher mean strength ($5.0840$ MPa) compared to the self-adhesive system ($4.2993$ MPa). Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test confirmed significant differences between both groups ($p < 0.05$), demonstrating that the total-etch and prior bonding protocol of RelyX™ ARC provides superior tensile anchoring capacity. It is concluded that, despite the clinical advantage of simplifying steps, the dual-cure adhesive resin cement offers superior performance in the fixation of intraradicular posts under the evaluated in vitro conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assif, D., & Bleicher, S. (1986). Retention of serrated endodontic posts with a composite luting agent: Effect of cement thickness. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 56(6), 689–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90145-9

Bitter, K., Meyer-Lueckel, H., Priehn, K., Kanjuparambil, J. P., Neumann, K., & Kielbassa, A. M. (2006). Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. International Endodontic Journal, 39(10), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x

Campos, M., Bader, M., & Ehrmantraut, M. (2011). Análisis in vitro de la efectividad de la transmisión de la luz a través de postes de fibra de vidrio en la polimerización de un cemento de resina compuesta [Trabajo de investigación requisito para optar al título de Cirujano Dentista, Universidad de Chile].

Cedillo, J., & Espinosa, R. (2011). Nuevas tendencias para la cementación de postes. Practica Clínica, Rev ADM, 68(4), 196–206. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/adm/od-2011/od114i.pdf

Farah, J., & Powers, J. (2003). Non-metal post. Dent Advisor, 20(5), 523–525. https://www.cda-adc.ca/jcda/vol-70/issue-8/521.pdf

Ferrari, M., Mannocci, F., Vichi, A., Cagidiaco, M. C., & Mjör, I. A. (2000). Bonding to root canal: Structural characteristics of the substrate. American Journal of Dentistry, 13(5), 255–260. https://europepmc.org/article/med/11764112

Ferrari, M., Vichi, A., Grandini, S., & Goracci, C. (2001). Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: An SEM investigation. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 14(6), 543–549. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12066701/

Garita, A. (2007). Comparación in vitro de la fuerza de retención en endopostes de fibra de vidrio prefabricados entre los cementos de resina autograbable, cemento de resina convencional y cemento de ionómero de vidrio modificado con resina [Trabajo de titulación, Universidad Latinoamericana De Ciencia Y Tecnología].

Henostroza, G. (2010). Adhesión en odontología restauradora (2ª ed.). ALODYB, Editorial Médica Ripano.

Henríquez, P. (2012). Estudio comparativo in vitro de la resistencia adhesiva de postes de fibra de vidrio cementados mediante técnica adhesiva convencional y cementos autoadhesivos [Trabajo de titulación, Universidad de Chile].

Jara, P., Martínez, A., Correa, G., & Catalán, A. (2010). Estudio in vitro de la resistencia a la tracción de postes de fibra de vidrio cementados con cuatro agentes cementantes. Avances en Odontoestomatología, 26(5), 255–262. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852010000500005&lng=es&tlng=es

Kahnamouei, M., Mohammadi, N., Navimipour, E., & Shakerifar, M. (2012). Push-out bond strength of quartz fibre posts to root canal dentin using total-etch and self-adhesive resin cements. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, 17(2), e337–e344. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17429

Libman, W. J., & Nicholls, J. I. (1995). Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 8(2), 155–161. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7575967/

Mallat, E. (2007). Prótesis fija estética: Un enfoque clínico e interdisciplinario. Editorial Elsevier.

Nocchi, E. (2012). Odontología restauradora: Salud y estética: Médica Panamericana.

Rengo, S. (1998). Importanza dell’interfaccia elastica nel restauro degli elementi dentari trattati endodónticamente con perni di carbonio. G. It. Endo.

Santana, G., Da Costa, R., & Braz, R. (2009). Cemento resinoso: ¿Todo cemento dual debe ser foto activado? Acta Odontológica Venezolana, 47(4), 225–233. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-63652009000400020&lng=es&tlng=es

Scotti, R., & Ferrari, M. (2004). Pernos de fibra: Bases teóricas y aplicaciones clínicas. Editorial Masson.

Shillingburg, H. (2002). Fundamentos esenciales de prótesis fija (3ª ed.). Quintessence.

White S. N. (1993). Adhesive cements and cementation. Journal of the California Dental Association, 21(6), 30–37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7692005/

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Sierra-Adasme, B. A., Villalva-León, C. L., & Fiallos-Sánchez, J. E. (2026). Tensile bond strength of dual-cure and self-adhesive resin cements to fiber posts: an in vitro study. Revista UGC, 4(2), 45–52. Retrieved from https://universidadugc.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/rugc/article/view/339