Comparison of self-etch and total-etch dental adhesives: a systematic review using prisma 2020 methodology

Authors

Keywords:

Self-etch adhesives, total-etch adhesives, effectiveness, durability, postoperative sensitivity

Abstract

Dental adhesion is an essential clinical step in restorative treatments, and among the available bonding methods, self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems stand out. The objective of this systematic review was to compare their effectiveness in terms of bond strength, durability, and postoperative sensitivity. To this end, exhaustive searches were carried out in databases such as PubMed, SciELO, and Redalyc, including articles published from 2015 onwards in Spanish, English, and Portuguese. Meta-analyses and in vitro studies that directly evaluated both types of adhesives were selected, following the guidelines of the updated PRISMA 2020 guide for the identification and assessment of study quality. The results showed that both self-etch and total-etch adhesives are effective in dental adhesion, although relevant differences were observed: total-etch systems generally offer higher immediate bond strength, while self-etch systems reduce postoperative sensitivity. It is concluded that both systems provide adequate clinical performance, but more long-term research is needed to determine their durability with greater precision and consolidate the available evidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bühler Borges, A., Abu Hasna, A., Guedes Nogueira Matuda, A., Ribeiro Lopes, S., Valente Pinho Mafetano, A. P., Arantes, A., Ferreira Duarte, A., Camara Barcellos, D., Rocha Gomes Torres, C., & Rogério Pucci, C. (2019). Adhesive systems effect over bond strength of resin-infiltrated and de/remineralized enamel. F1000Research, 8, 1743. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20523.1

Cestari Fagundes, T., Simões Gonçalves, R., De Souza e Silva Ramos, F., De Castro Oliveira, L., Dias Moda, M., & Sanae Shinohara, M. (2023). Effect of different conditions and modes of application on bond strength of adhesives to dentine. Revista Estomatológica Herediana, 33(1), 18–25. https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/4430

Chen, H., Feng, S., Jin, Y., Hou, Y., & Zhu, S. (2022). Comparison of bond strength of universal adhesives using different etching modes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Materials Journal, 41(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-111

De Freitas Borges, M., Diesel, P. G., Corrêa, F. G., Bernardi, E., Fernandes Montagner, A., Skupien, J. A., & Susin, A. H. (2010). Reflections about adhesive systems. International Journal of Odontostomatology, 4(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-381x2010000100008

Deb, A., Pai, V., Akhtar, A., & Nadig, R. R. (2021). Evaluation of microleakage of micro hybrid composite resins versus chitosan-incorporated composite resins when restored in Class V cavities using total etch and self-etch adhesives: An in vitro study: An in vitro study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 12(4), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_414_20

Digole, V. R., Warhadpande, M. M., Dua, P., & Dakshindas, D. (2020). Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of two self-etch adhesive systems with total-etch adhesive system in noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 23(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_166_20

Encarnación, W., De la Cruz, D., Herencia, S., & Velásquez, Z. (2023). Efectividad antimicrobiana de los sistemas adhesivos. Una alternativa eficaz: revisión bibliográfica. Revista estomatológica herediana, 33(4), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v33i4.5120

Kasraei, S., Azarsina, M., & Majidi, S. (2011). In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Operative Dentistry, 36(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-215-L

Lawson, N. C., Robles, A., Fu, C.-C., Lin, C. P., Sawlani, K., & Burgess, J. O. (2015). Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. Journal of Dentistry, 43(10), 1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009

Lennon, Á. M., Reich, N. S., Ferstl, G., Ebensberger, H., Hiller, K.-A., & Buchalla, W. (2024). Shear bond strength of adhesives placed following selective removal of red-fluorescing carious dentine in vitro. Caries Research, 58(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000534349

Luo, C. Y., Peng, C. F., Yang, Y., Qin, M., & Wang, Y. Y. (2020). Effects of three self-etch adhesives and mild salivary contamination on the bonding durability of deciduous teeth. Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban [Journal of Peking University. Health Sciences], 53(1), 46–53. https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc7867989

Ma, K. S.-K., Wang, L.-T., & Blatz, M. B. (2023). Efficacy of adhesive strategies for restorative dentistry: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials over 12 months of follow-up. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 67(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00279

Mandri, M. N., Prieto, A., & Zamudio, M. E. (2015). Sistemas adhesivos en Odontología Restauradora. Odontoestomatologia, 17(26), 50–56. http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/ode/v17n26/v17n26a06.pdf

Manihani, A., Mulay, S., Beri, L., Shetty, R., Gulati, S., & Dalsania, R. (2021). Effect of total-etch and self-etch adhesives on the bond strength of composite to glass-ionomer cement/resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in the sandwich technique - A systematic review. Dental Research Journal, 18(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.326645

Mézquita-Rodrigo, I., Scougall-Vilchis, R. J., Moyaho-Bernal, M. A., Rodríguez-Vilchis, L. E., Rubio-Rosas, E., & Contreras-Bulnes, R. (2022). Using self-etch adhesive agents with pit and fissure sealants. In vitro analysis of shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index and enamel etching patterns. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry: Official Journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 23(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00655-w

Mirotti, G., Lutri, M. P., Kraemer, M. E., Monserrat, N., Piconi, M. C., Caballero, A. L., Rozas, C. A., Croharé, L. M., & Sezin, M. (2022). Universal adhesives applied to deep dentin with different bonding treatments. Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana, 35(3), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/3/188

Morales Cobra Carvalho, A. P., & Lacalle Turbino, M. L. (2009). Can previous acid etching increase the bond strength of a self-etching primer adhesive to enamel? Brazilian Oral Research, 23(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242009000200013

Muñoz Padilla, M. B., Vega Martínez, V. A., & Villafuerte Moya, C. A. (2024). Interpretation of biosafety in endodontics by means of a literature review using PRISMA 2020 methodology. Salud Ciencia y Tecnología, 4, 925. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024925

Nair, P., & Ilie, N. (2020). The long-term consequence of salivary contamination at various stages of adhesive application and clinically feasible remedies to decontaminate. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24(12), 4413–4426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03307-3

Ozer, F., & Blatz, M. B. (2013). Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995), 34(1), 12–30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23550327/

Rodas Tacuri, W. X., Vintimilla Coronel, S. E., & Morales Bravo, B. R. (2022). Uso de adhesivo universal con pregrabado y autograbado en tejidos duros del diente. Medicentro, 26(4), 897–914. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/medicentro/cmc-2022/cmc224f.pdf

Schoenhals, G. P., Berft, C. L., Naufel, F. S., Schmitt, V. L., & Chaves, L. P. (2019). Bond strength assessment of a universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes. Revista de odontologia da UNESP, 48. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.08319

Sengar, E. V., Mulay, S., Beri, L., Gupta, A., Almohareb, T., Binalrimal, S., Robaian, A., Bahammam, M. A., Bahammam, H. A., Bahammam, S. A., Zidane, B., Albar, N. H., Bhandi, S., Shrivastava, D., Srivastava, K. C., & Patil, S. (2022). Comparative evaluation of microleakage of flowable composite resin using etch and rinse, self-etch adhesive systems, and self-adhesive flowable composite resin in Class V cavities: Confocal laser microscopic study. Materials, 15(14), 4963. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144963

Valsan, D., Bhaskaran, S., Mathew, J., Hari, K., & Joy, J. (2023). Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy of Multimode Adhesive, Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive, and a Total-Etch System to Pulpal Floor Dentin - An In vitro Study. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 14(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_754_21

Yollar, M., Karaoglanoglu, S., Altiparmak, E. T., Aybala Oktay, E., Aydin, N., & Ersoz, B. (2023). The effects of dental adhesives total etch; self-etch and selective etch application procedures on microleakage in class II composite restorations. European Oral Research, 57(3), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231197657

Yoshikawa, T., & Arakawa, M. (2022). Effects of C-factor on dentin bonding using various adhesive systems. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 25(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_1364_21

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Rodríguez-Cuellar, Y., Nolivos-Sánchez, G. E., & Palacios-Chiriboga, G. I. (2026). Comparison of self-etch and total-etch dental adhesives: a systematic review using prisma 2020 methodology. Revista UGC, 4(2), 104–111. Retrieved from https://universidadugc.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/rugc/article/view/347