Due process and digital justice in Ecuador

Authors

Keywords:

Due process, fundamental rights, challenges, digital justice, effective judicial protection

Abstract

This article focuses on the study of due process and effective judicial protection in the context of digital justice in Ecuador. The procedural problem that guides the research is based on the challenges that arise in Ecuadorian digital justice to effectively guarantee the exercise of due process and effective judicial protection. The general objective is to assess the legal and technological transformation of the judicial system, from the examination of the national regulatory framework and international human rights instruments to the social and practical impact of digitalization on the access to, exercise of, and protection of fundamental rights. The article examines the doctrine of the right to due process, its constitutional regulation, and the criteria developed by national and regional case law in this field. It also reviews the right to effective judicial protection and digital justice in terms of their definition, components, evolution, the use of electronic case files, telematic hearings, evidentiary authenticity, the protection of personal data and the incorporation of artificial intelligence, as well as the regulatory, institutional and cultural challenges linked to the digital divide and resistance to change. International experiences related to this type of justice are analyzed. The methodology used is qualitative, and methods such as the analytical‑legal and comparative approaches, among others, are applied. The article concludes that digitalization creates opportunities to modernize and streamline the judicial system; however, it faces challenges in guaranteeing due process and effective judicial protection. Therefore, to ensure the exercise of these constitutional rights and achieve responsible technological governance, the article proposes actions such as updating regulations, strengthening digital training, reducing the technological gap, promoting transparency and adapting good international practices to the national context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agudelo, M. (2015). El debido proceso. Temis.

Berman, H. (2017). Derecho y revolución: La formación de la tradición jurídica occidental. Harvard University Press.

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2016). Caso N.° 1470-14-EP. https://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/e2NhcnBldGE6J2VzY3JpdG8nLCB1dWlkOic1ODZmZmI4ZS0wMmE4LTRmYTQtOWFhNy00ZjYxODBhOTFiMDgucGRmJ30=

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2018). Sentencia N.° 136-16-SEP-CC. https://vlex.ec/vid/aceptese-accion-extraordinaria-proteccion-650404277

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2001). Caso Baena Ricardo y otros vs. Panamá. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_104_esp.pdf

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2004). Caso Tibi vs. Ecuador. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_114_esp.pdf

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial No 449.

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2009). Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial. Registro Oficial 544. https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/2009/es/104132

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2015). Código Orgánico General de Procesos (COGEP). Registro Oficial Suplemento 506. https://www.consejodecomunicacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/12/lotaip/C%C3%93DIGO%20ORG%C3%81NICO%20GENERAL%20DE%20PROCESOS%20-%20COGEP.pdf

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2021). Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales. Registro Oficial Suplemento 459. https://www.sot.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/21.-Ley-Organica-de-Proteccion-de-datos.pdf

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2023). Ley Orgánica para la Transformación Digital y Audiovisual. Registro Oficial 245. https://www.tce.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Ley-Transformacion-Digital-y-Audiovisual.pdf

Ferrajoli, L. (2019). Derecho y Razón. Teoría del garantismo penal. Trotta.

Fierro, J. (2022). Análisis de la tutela judicial efectiva en procesos ejecutados por la corte constitucional ecuatoriana. Revista Científica FIPCAEC, 7(1), 737-750. https://doi.org/10.23857/fipcaec.v7i1.546

León-González, J. L., & Pire-Rojas, A. (Comp). (2025). Investigación, neurociencia e inteligencia artificial: Hacia una formación universitaria integral. Sophia Editions.

Medina Peña, R., Muñoz Alfonso, Y., Campos Pérez, Y., & Hernández Domínguez, D. L. (2025). Inteligencia artificial, ética y derechos. Desafíos. Editorial Exced.

Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (1948). Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos. ONU. https://www.un.org/es/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (1966). Pacto Internacional de los Derechos Civiles y Políticos. Resolución 2200 A (XXI). https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

Organización de Estados Americanos. (1969). Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos. https://www.oas.org/dil/esp/1969_Convenci%C3%B3n_Americana_sobre_Derechos_Humanos.pdf

Pérez, L. (2021). La investigación jurídica. Métodos, técnicas e instrumentos científicos. Leyer.

Rodríguez, J. (2021). Nuevas tecnologías, inteligencia artificial y Estado de derecho. https://rodriguezarana.com/nuevas-tecnologias-y-estado-de-derecho/

Sang, J. (2021). Internet court on solving online consumer contract disputes: Case of China. Digital Law Journal, 2(3), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-3-23-45

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Cuenca-Masache, B. G., Chuncho-Cajamarca, L. E., García-Segarra, H. G., & Serrano-Saico, M. R. (2026). Due process and digital justice in Ecuador. Revista UGC, 4(2), 186–192. Retrieved from https://universidadugc.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/rugc/article/view/359